<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CovenantCreation.Com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://covenantcreation.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://covenantcreation.com</link>
	<description>Where Covenant and Creation Meet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:21:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Doesn&#8217;t Answers in Genesis Tell You the Truth?</title>
		<link>http://covenantcreation.com/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://covenantcreation.com/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 01:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[tim martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[answers in genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[origin of species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spurgeon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http:/?p=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Doesn&#8217;t Answers in Genesis Tell You the Truth? February 26, 2009 About a month ago I wrote a brief article regarding a sermon Charles Haddon Spurgeon preached on July 17, 1855. What makes this sermon notable is that Spurgeon made his view of creation clear. He believed planet Earth is millions of years old. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><strong>Why Doesn&#8217;t <em>Answers in Genesis</em> Tell You the Truth?</strong></h1>
<p>February 26, 2009</p>
<p>About a month ago I wrote a <a href="http://beyondcreationscience.com/index.php?pr=Spurgeon_Sermon_Quote">brief 	article</a> regarding a sermon Charles Haddon Spurgeon preached  on July 17, 1855. What makes this sermon notable is that Spurgeon made  his view of 	creation clear. He believed planet Earth is millions of years old. Here  is the 	passage on creation from the sermon titled &#8220;The Power of the Holy  Ghost&#8221;: 	 	<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	About a month ago I wrote a <a href="../../../../../../index.php?pr=Spurgeon_Sermon_Quote">brief
	article</a> regarding a sermon Charles Haddon Spurgeon preached on July 17, 1855. What makes this sermon notable is that Spurgeon made his view of
	creation clear. He believed planet Earth is millions of years old. Here is the
	passage on creation from the sermon titled "The Power of the Holy Ghost":
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In the 2d verse of the first chapter of Genesis, we read, 		‘And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of 		the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.&#8217; We know not 		how remote the period of the creation of this globe may be-certainly many 		millions of years before the time of Adam. Our planet has passed through 		various stages of existence, and different kinds of creatures have lived on its 		surface, all of which have been fashioned by God. But before that era came, 		wherein man should be its principal tenant and monarch, the Creator gave up the 		world to confusion.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; Charles Haddon Spurgeon. <a href="http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/0030.htm" target="_blank">Sermon 		delivered on Sunday, June 17, 1855 at New Park Street Chapel.</a> <script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>		"In the 2d verse of the first chapter of Genesis, we read,
		‘And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of
		the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters.' We know not
		how remote the period of the creation of this globe may be-certainly many
		millions of years before the time of Adam. Our planet has passed through
		various stages of existence, and different kinds of creatures have lived on its
		surface, all of which have been fashioned by God. But before that era came,
		wherein man should be its principal tenant and monarch, the Creator gave up the
		world to confusion." </p>
<p>		-- Charles Haddon Spurgeon. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/0030.htm" target="_blank">Sermon
		delivered on Sunday, June 17, 1855 at New Park Street Chapel.</a>
// ]]&gt;</script></p></blockquote>
<p>The timing is interesting. Note the date. This 	sermon was delivered some four years <em>before</em> Darwin published his <em>Origin of Species</em> in 1859. Yet Spurgeon, universally acclaimed as a conservative, Bible-believing 	preacher was <em>already</em> preaching some 	form of old-earth creationism from his pulpit at New Park Street Chapel.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	The timing is interesting. Note the date. This
	sermon was delivered some four years <i>before</i>
	Darwin published his <i>Origin of Species</i>
	in 1859. Yet Spurgeon, universally acclaimed as a conservative, Bible-believing
	preacher was <i>already</i> preaching some
	form of old-earth creationism from his pulpit at New Park Street Chapel.
// ]]&gt;</script>My initial article caught the attention of 	someone else who was shocked about Spurgeon&#8217;s statement. He wrote <a href="http://johnscorner.blogspot.com/2009/02/does-old-earthold-universe.html" target="_blank">his 	own article on Spurgeon&#8217;s sermon</a>, expanding on what I had said earlier. My 	point was that Spurgeon would have been characterized as a &#8220;liberal 	evolutionist&#8221; if young-earth creationist organizations were consistent in their 	criticism of old-earth creationists. According to them, Bible teachers and 	preachers who accept an ancient universe are guilty of compromising with modern 	science and atheistic Darwinism. 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	Imagine my surprise when I noticed that <em>Answers in Genesis</em> recently began 	putting Spurgeon&#8217;s sermons on their website! They called their program, which 	began on January 29, 2009, <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/01/29/charles-spurgeon-reloaded" target="_blank">&#8220;Charles 	Spurgeon &#8211; Reloaded.&#8221;</a> AiG says it was designed so that the <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/01/29/charles-spurgeon-reloaded" target="_blank">&#8220;&#8230;version you 	read adheres as closely as possible to the original intent-but updated so that 	the sermons can be enjoyed for years to come.&#8221;</a> I thought to myself, &#8220;Hmmm&#8230;This 	should be interesting&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Imagine my surprise when I noticed that <i>Answers in Genesis</i> recently began
	putting Spurgeon's sermons on their website! They called their program, which
	began on January 29, 2009, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/01/29/charles-spurgeon-reloaded">"Charles
	Spurgeon - Reloaded."</a> AiG says it was designed so that the "...version you
	read adheres as closely as possible to the original intent-but updated so that
	the sermons can be enjoyed for years to come." I thought to myself, "Hmmm...This
	should be interesting..."
// ]]&gt;</script> <script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	My initial article caught the attention of
	someone else who was shocked about Spurgeon's statement. He wrote <a target="_blank" href="http://johnscorner.blogspot.com/2009/02/does-old-earthold-universe.html">his
	own article on Spurgeon's sermon</a>, expanding on what I had said earlier. My
	point was that Spurgeon would have been characterized as a "liberal
	evolutionist" if young-earth creationist organizations were consistent in their
	criticism of old-earth creationists. According to them, Bible teachers and
	preachers who accept an ancient universe are guilty of compromising with modern
	science and atheistic Darwinism.
// ]]&gt;</script>I curiously waited for <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/02/26/power-of-holy-ghost" target="_blank">&#8220;The 	Power of the Holy Ghost&#8221;</a> to show up on the AiG website. It arrived right on 	schedule, but guess what I found when I read the sermon? Compare the original 	with AiG&#8217;s &#8220;updated&#8221; version to see the difference for yourself.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	I curiously waited for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/02/26/power-of-holy-ghost">"The
	Power of the Holy Ghost"</a> to show up on the AiG website. It arrived right on
	schedule, but guess what I found when I read the sermon? Compare the original
	with AiG's "updated" version to see the difference for yourself.
// ]]&gt;</script>Here is the original again:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Here is the original again:
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<blockquote><p>“In the 2d verse of the first chapter of 		Genesis, we read, &#8220;And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness 		was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the 		waters.&#8221; We know not how remote the period of the creation of this globe 		may be—certainly many millions of years before the time of Adam. Our planet has 		passed through various stages of existence, and different kinds of creatures 		have lived on its surface, all of which have been fashioned by God. But before 		that era came, wherein man should be its principal tenant and monarch, the 		Creator gave up the world to confusion.” <a href="http://www.spurgeon.org/sermons/0030.htm" target="_blank">Full text of original edition 		is available online here.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Here is Aig&#8217;s &#8220;updated&#8221; version of the same 	passage:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Here is Aig's "updated" version of the same
	passage:
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;In Ge 		1:2, we read, ‘And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness 		was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the 		waters.&#8217; Our planet has passed through various stages in creation, and 		different kinds of creatures have lived on its surface, all of which have been 		fashioned by God. But before that era came, when man should be its principal 		tenant and monarch, the Creator initially created the world as a chaotic mass 		on the first day of creation.&#8221; <a href="http://www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2009/02/26/power-of-holy-ghost" target="_blank">Full 		text of AiG&#8217;s &#8220;updated&#8221; edition is available online here.</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Did you catch what is missing? This sentence was 	entirely removed:</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Did you catch what is missing? This sentence was
	entirely removed:
// ]]&gt;</script></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;We know not how remote the period of the 		creation of this globe may be-certainly many millions of years before the time 		of Adam.&#8221; 		 		<script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>		"We know not how remote the period of the
		creation of this globe may be-certainly many millions of years before the time
		of Adam."
// ]]&gt;</script></p></blockquote>
<p>Poof! Gone. Like it never existed.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Poof! Gone. Like it never existed.
// ]]&gt;</script>Spurgeon&#8217;s sermon has been sanitized for the AiG 	audience. Apparently, the reality of Spurgeon as an old-earth creationist is 	too much for AiG to allow the viewing public to know about. They even <em>rewrote</em> a portion at the end to change 	Spurgeon&#8217;s statement that &#8220;the Creator gave up the world to confusion&#8221; to make 	it appear that Spurgeon said merely that &#8220;the Creator initially created the world as 	a chaotic mass on the first day of creation.&#8221; And presto! The editors turned 	Spurgeon into a young-earth creationist, <em>even 	though he said no such thing.</em> This handy-dandy doctored version of Spurgeon&#8217;s 	sermon expunges anything young-earth advocates might find offensive. But it 	also reveals something about AiG. They are willing to literally <em>rewrite</em> history when it serves their own 	agenda.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	This handy-dandy doctored version of Spurgeon's
	sermon expunges anything young-earth advocates might find offensive. But it
	also reveals something about AiG. They are willing to literally <i>rewrite</i> history when it serves their own
	agenda.
// ]]&gt;</script> <script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Spurgeon's sermon has been sanitized for the AiG
	audience. Apparently, the reality of Spurgeon as an old-earth creationist is
	too much for AiG to allow the viewing public to know about. They even <i>rewrote</i> a portion at the end to change
	Spurgeon's statement that "the Creator gave up the world to confusion" to make
	it appear that Spurgeon merely that "the Creator initially created the world as
	a chaotic mass on the first day of creation." And presto! The editors turned
	Spurgeon into a young-earth creationist, <i>even
	though he said no such thing.</i>
// ]]&gt;</script>I guess I shouldn&#8217;t be all that surprised about 	AiG&#8217;s dishonesty. People have been complaining about shenanigans like this from 	AiG for years. But it does raise a question in my mind. If they are willing to 	brazenly misrepresent Spurgeon&#8217;s views, even to the point of deleting 	&#8220;sensitive&#8221; parts and re-writing Spurgeon&#8217;s words to make it appear he preached 	nothing but young-earth creationism, then what else might AiG be lying about? I 	mean, if they are willing to do this with something as widely available in 	public as Spurgeon sermons, are they trustworthy in more obscure and technical 	matters such as scientific research? Would they fudge on those details if they 	didn&#8217;t line up with their young-earth doctrine?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[
	ta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></p>
<p>	I guess I shouldn't be all that surprised about
	AiG's dishonesty. People have been complaining about shenanigans like this from
	AiG for years. But it does raise a question in my mind. If they are willing to
	brazenly misrepresent Spurgeon's views, even to the point of deleting
	"sensitive" parts and re-writing Spurgeon's words to make it appear he preached
	nothing but young-earth creationism, then what else might AiG be lying about? I
	mean, if they are willing to do this with something as widely available in
	public as Spurgeon sermons, are they trustworthy in more obscure and technical
	matters such as scientific research? Would they fudge on those details if they
	didn't line up with their young-earth doctrine?
// ]]&gt;</script><br />
Why doesn&#8217;t <em>Answers 	in Genesis</em> tell you the truth?</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript">// <![CDATA[</p>
<p>	Why doesn't <i>Answers
	in Genesis</i> tell you the truth?
// ]]&gt;</script>Tim 	Martin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://covenantcreation.com/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

